Both of these subjects are friends …show more content…
Without it, friendships will most likely become defunct. People need to be able to talk to family, friends, peers, co-workers, partners/lovers, etc., in order to have healthy relationships. Communication is all about sharing. Whether it is sharing thoughts, opinions, or feelings, talking any situation out is so important. In a friendship, no one is perfect. Friends are going to upset each other sometimes and occasionally have a fall out. That is normal. What is not normal or healthy is not communicating. If no one knows how each other feel in a certain situation or if no one can understand their friend’s reactions to something, then where will they get? Communication is not all about conflict. Sometimes it is just important to talk about how their day went, how they are feeling, what is on their mind, and so on. Friends should be able to criticize each other without conflict. Criticism is not about just pointing out someone’s flaws. It is about being comfortable enough to share thoughts about a certain subject, whether it is what someone is doing or saying. Positive criticism is not putting each other down. It is simply communicating how to improve on something. Not communicating properly or not communicating at all hampers friendships. Austin is stubborn simply because he is somewhat of a debater and always comes up with ways to counter a statement. At the same time, when he realizes he is wrong, he is remorseful. Communication is not a problem with him. He is very mature for his age and knows that talking it out is how to get to the root of a problem. Saul is always ready to let others know how he feels, when there is a problem, or when there is something going on in his life. Likewise, there is no problem with communication for him either. Both will stay up late, until the early mornings, just talking about life, religion, school, life at home, conspiracies, etc. The list goes on. They both believe