The stern class system of the French had long positioned the nobility and clergy way ahead of the remaining French citizens, notwithstanding the notion that a lot of those inhabitants had more capital and revenue than the noble including wealth and reputation. Additionally, these high-class designations, most of which had been inherited and been in succession through families, basically put them over the law and relieved them from dues and taxes. When France’s antediluvian legislative organization called the Estates-General, resumed and it became obvious that higher classes would not want to give up their civil liberties in the concern of redeeming the country. This most definitely brought the French bourgeoisie to peak frustration. The French Revolution was ultimately a fight to attain equivalence between social classes and eliminate oppression. The concerns were much more deep rooted and widespread than the immediate monetary turmoil France was going through at that point in …show more content…
Another way the French Revolution differs from other books is the way the war was fought. Different methods of violence were used in that period of history, as shown in the following excerpt, “Thus citizens had to be coerced into obedience and imprisoned or executed where there were any doubts… The Terror had entered its most murderous phase at exactly the time when the foreign threat had receded” (176). Lower class French citizens that had any thoughts of rebelling or becoming radical were dealt with accordingly. With that said, still many lower class citizens that were willing to take that risk in order to achieve liberty. They would pay any price for freedom, so they