Organisms in the world are social or unsocial. But where the problem lies is that there are essentially no unsocial animals in the world. From the smallest bee …show more content…
But in order to not have war humans, along with all other social creatures, would have to become unsocial, as stated by Margaret Mead all social creatures would have to get rid of “…classes…power…and possessions” (Mead 275). Mead also attempts to point the finger at humans for developing war and power by stating that “warfare” is just an invention created to allow the acquirement of prestige (Mead 279). The issue with Mead’s statement is that hierarchy in the animal kingdom is natural it has been established well before humans were created. Humans would have to act unnaturally in order to preserve peace. There would be no borders between countries since there would be nothing to worry about but at the same time there would be no advancement, no culture and the characteristic of being human is gone, all creatures would essentially be walking chemical reactions free from