In the court trials the defendant uses the sixth amendment rights to point out Miranda’s “to have the assistance of counsel for his defence” (amend. VI). The Sixth amendment speaks of the right to a lawyer in court for the criminal, and how it is his/her specific right to representation in court, and that doesn’t affect the people outside of the case, so it does not affect the good of the citizens. Likewise, the Fifth Amendment is used a great deal in the Supreme Court trials, and it gives the right to remain silent during interrogation. This right is for private interrogation between law enforcers and the suspect, the public is not included in on this event. The rights used to win this case were specifically for the individual criminal(s) that were being interrogated and put on trial, and the public would not be affected either way, they are personal and individual
In the court trials the defendant uses the sixth amendment rights to point out Miranda’s “to have the assistance of counsel for his defence” (amend. VI). The Sixth amendment speaks of the right to a lawyer in court for the criminal, and how it is his/her specific right to representation in court, and that doesn’t affect the people outside of the case, so it does not affect the good of the citizens. Likewise, the Fifth Amendment is used a great deal in the Supreme Court trials, and it gives the right to remain silent during interrogation. This right is for private interrogation between law enforcers and the suspect, the public is not included in on this event. The rights used to win this case were specifically for the individual criminal(s) that were being interrogated and put on trial, and the public would not be affected either way, they are personal and individual