However, if he chooses, he can attempt to manage his stigma, as seen in Anderson, Snow and Cress’s article “Stigma Management and Collective Action Among the Homeless”, or he can work through the process of accepting his stigma and learning to live with it, as seen in Nack’s “Damaged Goods: Women Managing the Stigma …show more content…
The delineation is whether the criminal is dealing with peers that suffer from the same stigma or the rest of the unlabeled population. When a criminal is released from prison or parole, they are sent back into the normal population without any coping mechanisms for dealing with their new stigma amongst those who are not criminals. First, I will look at his methods for dealing with the normal population, then I will look at his dealings with other stigma-related peers. I feel that in the case of a criminal thrust back into society they begin with attempting to blend in using “out-group” strategies and be “normal” more so than “in-group” strategies. As their blending in fails, they utilize more of the “in-group” strategies, and eventually fall back into their criminal ways, typically leading them back to the criminal justice system. “Out-group” strategies that a criminal might use to try and blend in with society include passing, covering, and defiance. The criminal tries to blend in with society by passing himself off as non-stigmatized. He may avoid talking about his past or may even invent a past history that doesn’t exist. He will avoid any and all contexts where someone may recognize him from his criminal past and he will avoid any locations where he may come into contact with previous criminal associates. Should he be exposed as a criminal he will do his best to cover