The argument for the existence of God in the designing of life mainly stems from “subjective insight and traditional authority,” which classifies creation as more of an opinion rather than a theory, as previously stated (Smithsonian). However, many people believe that creation, though not fully supported by scientific evidence, can explain the complexity of living organisms on Earth. English clergyman William Paley was the first to publish arguments supporting this belief, claiming that humans and other life forms could not have emerged by chance; rather, only creation can explain the design of perfection and functionality among life (Ayala). Paley, among countless others, believe that creation is the only way to understand the beginnings of …show more content…
Concerning the teaching of science involving both creation and evolution in public schools, it may be best to discuss all of the various arguments rather than limiting students to a certain, specific viewpoint (DeWolf & Cooper). Therefore, creation, Intelligent Design, and other non-scientific beliefs should all be unbiasedly taught in schools along with the scientific evidence that supports evolution. Public schools should teach the various roles of science and religion in the beginnings of life, allowing students to have all the facts and evidential support to make a knowledgeable decision and strengthen their opinions