In order for further investigation in the experiment, the house cricket experiment helped what was being understood house cricket behavior with respect to residency. The null hypothesis revealed that the number of observed wins of the resident cricket will be equal to 50 percent is incorrect which makes the alternative hypothesis was proven correct during the Chi-squared testing. …show more content…
First of all, the experiment was performed in a classroom that had minimal resources to conduct the experiment. The class was limited to study the cricket’s aggression for a couple in the classroom of hours instead of several weeks as is usually done in a lab. Second, the same group of crickets were used for every lab that was held during the week. Since the same crickets were used, by the end of the week, the crickets had been tested on so many times and this could have affected the results in other lab classes. An example would be that Monday’s lab might have had the resident cricket winning 50 percent or more of interactions than a lab that was held later in the