But if every cartel meber decides to cheat, more goods are available at lower prices. Hence the industry will become more saturated which will lead to a price fall towards the equilibrium price in a competitive market. This is depicted in graph 2 by the difference between P4 and P3. In consequence the market “moves toward the competitive equilibrium”. (Bade, R., & Parkin, M., 2009)
To better explain the consequences of different price strategies of each player in a cartel we refer to the prisoner’s dilemma as described in the game theory.
For the purpose of explanation we chose an example with fictive prices and profits in which NFC cheats by lowering its prices.
If we assume that every company makes in a cartel equal profits and NFC sets lower prices than the other bearings manufacturers then NFC would maximize its profits to 150 bn € and lower therefore the profits of other participants to 450 bn €. This would mean that each of the members who went for the high price strategy would make an average profit of only 90 bn …show more content…
Cartels are very difficult to root without the help of insiders. Authorities have developed a leniency program that could aid the detection. It provides incentives for companies to confess and snitch on rivals. This has become so successful that around fifty countries in the world have followed the same path. Most of the big cartel cases unfolded from these confessions. Leniency schemes are designed to be “trees that grow more and more branches as edgy companies, fearful that rivals will squeal first, revel hidden sins. By rewarding the first customer with amnesty, the amnesty programs reduce the wisdom of the wait and see strategy for cartel members. (Allain,