Capital punishment does not have influence on the rate of crimes. According to Richard L Worsnop, he said,” Thorsten Sellin, compared homicide rates between adjacent states with and without the death penalty. Sellin then compered rates within states before and after they abolished capital punishment. Finally he examined homicide rates in cities where executions took place for evidence of a drop in murders following a publicized execution. He concluded there was no evidence to support the deterrent effect of death sentencing.” From this statement, it is understood that capital punishment is not a good way to decrease homicide rates and has no effect of death sentencing. Also, he said,” Statistics are used by individuals and organizations to reinforce their viewpoints on a particular issue, such as the death penalty’s deterrence effect. Studies to examine this have been conducted for years, with researchers arriving at vastly different conclusions—yet all are firmly convinced that they have proved what they wanted to prove. For instance, in the Death Penalty Information Center’s 2009 survey of police chiefs throughout the United States, 69 percent of respondents said that would-be murderers would not think about the range of possible punishments before committing homicide. In the final report, the group’s executive director writes: “The nation’s police chiefs rank the death penalty last in their priorities for effective crime reduction. The officers do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder.” From this statement, it is understood that many murderers do not think their punishment before they commit, so they are not afraid of punishment which they will receive. Therefore, capital punishment does not affect the rates of crimes, and murderers do not care about their punishment before they
Capital punishment does not have influence on the rate of crimes. According to Richard L Worsnop, he said,” Thorsten Sellin, compared homicide rates between adjacent states with and without the death penalty. Sellin then compered rates within states before and after they abolished capital punishment. Finally he examined homicide rates in cities where executions took place for evidence of a drop in murders following a publicized execution. He concluded there was no evidence to support the deterrent effect of death sentencing.” From this statement, it is understood that capital punishment is not a good way to decrease homicide rates and has no effect of death sentencing. Also, he said,” Statistics are used by individuals and organizations to reinforce their viewpoints on a particular issue, such as the death penalty’s deterrence effect. Studies to examine this have been conducted for years, with researchers arriving at vastly different conclusions—yet all are firmly convinced that they have proved what they wanted to prove. For instance, in the Death Penalty Information Center’s 2009 survey of police chiefs throughout the United States, 69 percent of respondents said that would-be murderers would not think about the range of possible punishments before committing homicide. In the final report, the group’s executive director writes: “The nation’s police chiefs rank the death penalty last in their priorities for effective crime reduction. The officers do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder.” From this statement, it is understood that many murderers do not think their punishment before they commit, so they are not afraid of punishment which they will receive. Therefore, capital punishment does not affect the rates of crimes, and murderers do not care about their punishment before they