I felt as if making mid-course corrections went along with the concept of teamwork, prioritizing and communication. After all, you did have to have all three of the aforementioned concepts in order to make mid-course corrections when there was a failure present. NASA had to improve a new mission by aborting the original mission making changes to everything. The three men were also talking together in the ship to see what their intentions are in order to make it home safe and determining how they could do so. To them, failure was not an option and even if it took bringing in their teammate who supposedly had the measles, it meant that they wanted to fix the problem and would do …show more content…
Apparently the hatch wouldn’t open on the ship and there was a fire. This time, they were assessing and planning the risk that the number 13 could have on the launch: Apollo 13 launching at 1300 hours and launching after 13 minutes. Also, a huge part of risk was the team’s lives in danger when things went down hill. All support teams were brought in and they were working their problems out instead of guessing. I guess it was a good thing that they learned from previous